Here’s a description of the analysis process as it stands, as succinct as possible.

<a href="/sanborn/LOC-Providence1889vol1_00005L.jpg">{=html}<img src="/sanborn/LOC-Providence1889vol1_00005L.jpg" style="float: left; width: 40%; margin-right: 3%; margin-bottom: 0.5em;">{=html} <a href="/sanborn/LOC-Providence1889vol1_00005L_out.jpg">{=html}<img src="/sanborn/LOC-Providence1889vol1_00005L_out.jpg" style="float: left; width: 40%; margin-right: 3%; margin-bottom: 0.5em;">{=html}

1
<p style="clear: both;">

</a>{=html}

<a href="/sanborn/DIG-Providence1920vol1_00027.jpg">{=html}<img src="/sanborn/DIG-Providence1920vol1_00027.jpg" style="float: left; width: 40%; margin-right: 3%; margin-bottom: 0.5em;">{=html} <a href="/sanborn/DIG-Providence1920vol1_00027_out.jpg">{=html}<img src="/sanborn/DIG-Providence1920vol1_00027_out.jpg" style="float: left; width: 40%; margin-right: 3%; margin-bottom: 0.5em;">{=html}

1
<p style="clear: both;">

</a>{=html}

Introduction

From the mid-19th to the mid-20th century, most homes, institutions, and factories in the US and much of Europe relied on gas produced from coal to light lamps and kitchen stoves. The production of manufactured gas (MFG, coal gas, or “town gas”) was a major business, and homes and business were increasingly linked via city-wide networks of underground gas pipes to central MFG production sites. Populous cities might include several dozen such sites, and even smaller, remote cities would have had at least one MFG plant by the end of the 1800s (Brown, 1886). Gas utilities additionally relied upon a network of intermediary gasholders (or “gasometers”) used to maintain adequate gas pressure for far-flung neighborhoods or institutions (Hatheway, 2012). Utility sites were joined by numerous smaller plants built to provide lighting, heat, or energy to individual institutions, including hospitals, educational institutions, manufacturing plants, railroad yards, and private estates. As MFG gave way to natural gas in the mid-20th century, the production and distribution sites that were once a striking visual symbol of the industrialized city were largely abandoned; some sites fell into disrepair, while others were demolished and the sites redeveloped for industrial, commercial, or residential use.

This is a problem because the MFG industry produced substantial waste products under minimal environmental regulation, principally coal tar and tar-related wastes (Ecology & Environment Inc, 1986; Hatheway, 2012; White and Barker, 1911). FMGP sites therefore signify the possible presence of compounds which present significant health hazards: Coal tar residuals contain the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon group of compounds, which represent both carcinogenic and mutagenic risk (Kim et al., 2013). Tar wastes are also persistent: Absent remediation, the risks associated with FMGP byproducts will not diminish (Hatheway, 2012). Health risks are compounded by the fact that pre-EPA zoning regulations largely failed to keep industry out of residential areas (Frickel and Elliott, 2018). In other words, undetected FMGP sites may lurk beneath areas not traditionally reserved for heavy industry, including residential or commercial corridors; waste compounds might additionally cross parcel boundaries through flooding or other hydraulic action.

Former manufactured gas plants (FMGPs) are routinely discovered by accident - perhaps as often as once a month across the US (Hatheway, 2012) - including the 1980 discovery in Stroudsburg, PA, of the first site to be listed under the Superfund program (Phillips, 1991). Despite demonstrated health risks associated with exposure to MFG byproducts and the near-total lack of regulatory oversight over the century-long span of the MFG industry, however, no full accounting of the MFG production and distribution network has been achieved. This is in part because of several limitations in available data which have made the identification of FMGP site locations at a comprehensive scale an expensive and time-consuming undertaking.

In response to these limitations, we propose a new method to precisely identify FMGP sites on a national scale by applying computer vision functions to digitized images of Sanborn fire insurance maps. This method focuses on a unique visual component of MFG production and distribution sites: The gasometer, or gas holder, a large circular building captured in period maps as a distinct circular outline. We developed Detect_Circles, a tool to identify circular structures in Sanborn map documents, and tested it with images drawn from five sets of Sanborn map scans covering the city of Providence, RI. Our results demonstrate that computer-aided map coding significantly reduces the time required to accurately locate possible FMGPs on a national scale and across multiple historical timepoints. This approach allows for a more complete accounting of the growth and extent of the MFG industry as a whole; it also makes way for a spatial analysis of the distribution of FMGP sites, as both a key component of the growth of the industrial city and as a source of contemporary contamination and toxic risk.

Significance

FMGP sites represent a particularly pressing case for environmental researchers, sociologists, and communities alike. Despite the impact of the MFG industry on daily life, the built environment, and the industrial economy for nearly a century, contemporary social and environmental scientists have yet to address the industry as a systemic source of persistent urban contamination. Moreover, even as individual FMGP sites have dogged municipalities and agencies responsible for site remediation, researchers and remediation professionals are ill-equipped to track possible FMGP-related toxicity. The remains of the MFG industry stretch across every major and minor urban center in the United States, yet the discovery of FMGP sites is largely accidental (Hatheway, 2012). These challenges are mirrored in related research into legacy urban hazards more broadly. Three effects compound to produce the unfortunate result that the study of legacy urban contaminants has, until recently, proceeded with halting progress: Historically insufficient regulatory oversight, decades of redevelopment and urban change, and contemporary regulatory practices that focus on large and visible remediation efforts at the expense of smaller, pedestrian sites (Frickel and Elliott, 2018). The development of new methods to locate and assess possible sources of legacy contamination is thus a necessary first step to introducing a class of site and contaminant to spatial and sociological analysis.

For it to be both scalable and accurate, an effective site identification method must satisfy requirements of both scope and specificity. By scope, we mean that data should be available on a consistently wide range of geographies and time periods, and must be in a form that lends itself to rapid identification using easily-reproducible methods. By specificity, we mean that each site must be precisely located in space and time, and must be accurately identified. A district holding station, for instance, presents a different level of hazard from a central production complex, and must be identifiable as such. Due to limitations in available data, prior attempts at identification have largely satisfied either the “scope” or “specificity” requirement while neglecting the other. This division is facilitated by the major types of historical FMGP data that are readily available.

Prior attempts to locate FMGP sites on a broad scale have primarily relied on national gas industry directories, principally Brown’s Directory of American Gas Companies, published annually starting in 1887. Industry directories list the names of manufactured gas production companies, chief company officers, manufacturing statistics, and gas service areas, and provide a useful measure of the size and scale of gas production in any given city. But Brown’s and other directories do not identify street addresses for production or distribution sites. To precisely geolocate former gas infrastructure, industrial historians and environmental remediation specialists generally rely on historic building-level atlases, most prominently those produced by the Sanborn Map Company and other fire insurance mappers. Sanborn maps were produced for nearly all US cities with a population greater than approximately 8,000 (Hatheway, 2012). Sanborn maps were published as large, multi-page atlases, and include such information as building perimeter outlines and details on site use and ownership. Their high degree of street-level detail allow for the precise geolocation of gas production, storage, and distribution sites. For the same reason, however, it is impractical to rely on Sanborn maps to locate infrastructure at any appreciable geographic scope. To illustrate this, we briefly present two research efforts that typify approaches that focus on scope or specificity, but fail to precisely identify site en masse.

Our first study is the 1985 EPA effort to identify FMGP sites based on industry directory listings (Radian Corporation, 1985). Focusing on 10-year increments of Brown’s Directory publications, the EPA study estimated the number of large FMGP producers in the US at about 1,500. It was the first and only attempt at a national FMGP census, but - like other approaches that rely on industry directories alone - the EPA attempt was later shown to have greatly underestimated the number of possible FMGP sites nationally (Hatheway, 2012) for two reasons. Gas industry directories list only the cities in which major MFG producers were registered; second, directories do not indicate the number or location of gas industry production, storage, or distribution sites. Directory listings therefore drastically underestimate the scale of MFG’s spatial legacy, and do not provide sufficient information to indicate the precise street-level location of manufactured gas infrastructure. Using greatly expanded criteria, Allen W. Hatheway’s research estimates the total number of FMGP sites at between 33,010 and 50,308 nationwide, many times greater than the number of sites identified by the EPA (2012).

Our second example is a 1986 project that sought to locate the FMGP sites identified in the 1985 EPA effort (Ecology & Environment Inc, 1986). This second study was conducted only for EPA Region X (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington), representing just 35 of the 1,500 sites identified the year before. Researchers identified site locations by pairing Brown’s Directory listings with Sanborn map data, and recommended sites for possible remediation based on information on current use. Study authors were aware that relying on Brown’s Directory information meant that they were likely missing district stations and other outlying utility sites. Their use of Sanborn map data nonetheless represented a clear extension from the broad-based approach of the 1985 EPA study, and study authors successfully located several dozen FMGP sites, several of which were shown to present possible hazards to human health. According to study documentation, however, locating map information for the 35 sites was budgeted at a full 86 hours - nearly two and a half hours per site. Researchers were also prepared with a full list of target sites prior to conducting street-level map searches; in contrast, the task of locating an unknown number of production, storage, and distribution sites by definition does not begin with a known, fixed universe of site names.

Both EPA efforts were shaped by the limitations built into their input data. Directory listings require little sifting to identify a broad range of possible FMGP sites within a given city or state, without providing information on where those sites may be located; Sanborn maps require significant investment to precisely locate specific sites, and benefit from having prior information on site whereabouts. See Table {([???]{.citeproc-not-found data-reference-id="tbl:approaches”})} below.

Source type Data Scope Pub. frequency Specificity


Industry directories Centralized National Annual Company name only Sanborn maps Fragmented National ~10 year increments Multiple site locations

Sanborn maps

Sanborn maps were published regularly starting in the late 19th century. Sanborn atlases cover most US cities with a population greater than about 6000 (Hatheway, 2012), and most larger cities were mapped and remapped at regular intervals to account for changes to the urban landscape. Atlases consist of multiple map volumes made up of several hundred pages representing just a few square blocks of city space. Today, map files are available for public use primarily via three database providers with different approaches to digitization, file storage, and access.


Source Completeness Access Map quality Download availability


ProQuest Most complete Many Low quality No bulk Sanborn university B+W line download Digital Ed. and public drawings
libraries

FIMo Most complete Some High quality No bulk university color scans download and public
libraries

Library of Very complete Publicly High quality Simple bulk Congress available color scans API

Library of Congress (LOC) maps are most amenable to large-scale map analysis for two reasons. First, LOC maps are available for bulk download using a simple script to communicate with the LOC API. The API allows for map downloads at any regional and temporal scale; for example, a single API query returns all Sanborn files for every city in New England across every available publication year. Second, LOC files are stored as high quality digital color scans. Most circular features are color-filled and therefore more easily identifiable using the Hough.Circles package.

ProQuest’s “Sanborn Digital Edition” and Fire Insurance Maps Online (FIMo) also host Sanborn map images. ProQuest maps are rendered as black and white line-drawings; they are widely available for multiple cities over multiple years, but suffer from low scan quality and frequent misprints. FIMo maps, like LOC map scans, are available in full color, but suffer from poor download resolution. The ProQuest and FIMo databases are marginally more complete than the LOC repository; neither database allows for bulk file downloads, however, severely limiting their utility for map analysis at a broad spatial and temporal scale. It is possible to partially automate the download process, using the CURL utility, by taking advantage of the fact that the ProQuest and Sanborn databases store map pages according to a predictable sequence of URLs. FIMo maps are stored in a sequence of logically-numbered JPG files with a common base URL, which allows us to download FIMo maps city-by-city or volume-by-volume. The ProQuest database instead iterates components of the URL path for each maps page, and stores map files as PDF documents with a single filename (“default.pdf”). The ProQuest database structure requires that we first generate a list of unique URLs based on a set of predictable parameters, which can automated for each map volume using a simple Python script. Even with the help of the CURL utility, however, ProQuest and FIMo maps are much less amenable to bulk analysis.

Map analysis

We use a simple Python script (“Detect_Circles”) to analyze Sanborn map images for circular features that correspond with possible FMGP building outlines.

::: {#refs .references .hanging-indent} ::: {#ref-ecologyenvironmentincCoalOilGasification1986} Ecology & Environment Inc (1986) Coal/oil gasification site study, Region X. TDD R10-8405-03, November. Seattle, WA: US Environmental Protection Agency. :::

::: {#ref-frickelSitesUnseenUncovering2018} Frickel S and Elliott JR (2018) Sites Unseen: Uncovering Hidden Hazards in American Cities. New York: Russel Sage Foundation. :::

::: {#ref-hathewayRemediationFormerManufactured2012} Hatheway AW (2012) Remediation of Former Manufactured Gas Plants and Other Coal-Tar Sites. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. :::

::: {#ref-radiancorporationSurveyTownGas1985} Radian Corporation (1985) Survey of town gas and by-product production and locations in the US (1880-1950). EPA-600/7-85-004, February. US Environmental Protection Agency. ::: :::